Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)
This is probably the most headline-grabbing piece of SECURE 2.0. Under prior rules, you were required to begin taking RMDs by April 1st of the year following the year you turned 72; however, SECURE 2.0 increases this age to 73, starting this year (Section 107). Another related aspect of this is the penalty for failing to take an RMD; that used to be 50% and now it has reduced to 25% (Section 302).
Action to consider: From an applicability standpoint (when someone should take an RMD), the age 73 requirement applies to anyone that attains age 72 after December 31, 2022. In most cases, a recordkeeper or third party administrator (TPA) will assist in determining when someone should receive an RMD and then work to process the payment, therefore, it would be advisable to reach out to the applicable service provider to ensure they are planning to administer RMDs in your plan under these new rules.
Roth Employer Contributions
Previously, when an employer made a contribution to a participant’s account (i.e. profit-sharing, match), the only option was for that contribution to be considered pre-tax, meaning taxation to the participant on that contribution would occur at the time of withdrawal (or conversion in the case of an in-plan Roth conversion). Now, plans have the option (via plan amendment) to allow participants that are 100% vested (this aspect is often missing in other articles) the option to pay the taxes on the employer contributions they receive, which in turn, essentially causes those contributions to become “Roth employer contributions.” From an employer standpoint nothing really changes, including the deductibility of employer contributions for tax purposes. If allowed by the plan, this is essentially a participant-by-participant decision (Section 604).
Action to consider: If you are interested in this option, the next step would be to inquire with your recordkeeper about whether they can accommodate this design. At this early stage, even if desired, it is unlikely that most recordkeepers will have the enhancements built out to make this a reality in your plan. Of course, you will also need to amend your plan in order to allow the option and that aspect of things still lacks clarity.
Participant Notices
Certain notices are required to be provided to participants initially and annually thereafter, and SECURE 2.0 reduces this burden to some extent. In short, participants who have elected not to make 401(k) contributions will no longer be required to receive certain notices. They must still, however, receive the Summary Plan Description (SPD) and an annual notice reminding them that they can participate in the plan (Section 320).
Action to consider: There may not be much on this front. Most plans utilize their recordkeeper for required notice distribution services and these providers, more and more, have turned to distributing notices electronically (regardless of whether the plan complies with the electronic distribution rules, but that is a whole other article). Given the low cost involved with electronic distribution, you may not see much of a state of change, however, if you are distributing notices yourself, it might save some work, around annual notice delivery time (generally November for calendar year plans), to run some reports and see who needs the “full set of notices” and who needs to receive a smaller packet of information.
Self-Certifying Hardships
Hardship distributions can be a bit of an administrative burden, given the need to collect documentation to support the hardship. SECURE 2.0 allows employees to self-certify that they experienced an event that constitutes a hardship and therefore, they are permitted to take a hardship distribution (Section 312).
Action to consider: Our due diligence on recordkeepers has shown that many will not allow hardship distribution processing to be outsourced, due to the requirement to collect documentation to support that the request is legitimate. With this update, if you were not previously able to outsource, you may be able to now, given that participants could self-certify. Like most of these updates, while this may be possible, it may take some time for the recordkeepers to build out the ability to receive self-certification as part of the online request workflow.